China Successfully Uses Market Mechanism For Sustainable Development

Belinda Kinkead

A CDKN study examines how much of China’s success with the CDM is due to policymakers approach and implemented controls that include coordinated capacity building, regular project checks and the involvement of powerful government ministries. The study reviews these approaches to see if they could be successful for sustainable development in other countries.

A CDKN study examines how much of China’s success with the CDM is due to policymakers approach and implemented controls that include coordinated capacity building, regular project checks and the involvement of powerful government ministries. The study reviews these approaches to see if they could be successful for sustainable development in other countries.

This article originally appeared on the Climate and Development Knowledge Network website. Click here to read the original. Please cite the original when referencing.

4 October 2012 | Ever since the Chinese Government approved the Kyoto Protocol in August 2002, it worked with a number of international and bilateral donors on many different Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) capacity building projects, such as the China CDM Study, funded by the World Bank, the Swiss Government and the German Agency for Technical Cooperation.

China currently dominates the CDM market with almost half of all CDM projects hosted in China. It has been so successful in China that it is sometimes labeled the ‘China Development Mechanism’.

CDKN’s “Harnessing Market Mechanisms to promote sustainable development-lessons from China,” by Belinda Kinkead of Ithaca Environmental Consultancies, looks at the CDM’s development in China and reasons for the mechanism’s success.

Development of the CDM in China

The Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) was created under the Kyoto Protocol to enable developing countries to sell carbon credits to developed countries. Countries that wish to engage in CDM projects must have ratified the Kyoto Protocol and appointed a DNA (Designated National Authority). As part of the required CDM validation process, the DNA of the country involved must provide the project participants with written host nation approval.

In 2001 the Marrakesh Accords contained the first guidelines on making the CDM operational. With both significant and growing greenhouse gas emissions, and many low-cost abatement options available, China was widely viewed as the country with the greatest potential to host CDM projects.

However, during the early years of the CDM, it was Brazil and India that dominated both in terms of the number of projects and volume of potential emission reductions. China was initially considered ‘slow off the mark’ in engaging with the CDM.

It was only in January 2005 that the Chinese DNA issued its first Host Nation Approval (HNA), and the first Chinese project was not registered with the CDM Executive Board until June of that year. The Chinese DNA took time to engage senior ministries and put in place first-of-their-kind controls on eligible project types, such as taxation or revenue sharing from certain types of projects and a minimum sale price for Certified Emission Reductions (CERs). As of 9 April 2012, the Chinese DNA has approved 3,935 CDM projects.

Coordinated Capacity Building

Both the Chinese Government and international donors saw a significant need to increase China’s capacity to initiate and implement CDM projects.

The two lead agencies for formulating and implementing climate policy in China, the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) and the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST), played a strong coordination role in ensuring there was minimal overlap between projects, and that each capacity building project focused on different needs at the national, local or project level. The NDRC is one of the most powerful ministries in China.

These agencies identified potential capacity needs and acted as gatekeepers for sign-off on donor-funded capacity building. This approach ensured that donor assistance was used in very specific areas and overlap was avoided, even if that meant turning down donor projects because they did not fit with the requirements of NDRC and MOST.

For example, in 2001 the Dutch Government signed a memorandum of understanding with the NDRC to undertake capacity building in the iron, steel and chemical sectors, ultimately to identify projects that could offer CERs. However, reported differences of opinion on how the project should be implemented – and by whom – lead to the project being abandoned entirely.

A key to China’s success was coordinating all international capacity building projects through gatekeeper agencies, which were not afraid to walk away from projects or negotiate strongly to achieve China’s desired outcomes.

Heavy-Hitting Ministries

One of the reasons CDM has been so successful in China is the involvement of ‘heavy-hitting’ ministries. Because climate change could have both significant economic and social implications, the NDRC has taken the leading role in the development and implementation of all climate policy in China, including chairing the CDM DNA, with MOST providing technical support.

The potential inflows of ‘hard’ currencies (e.g. USD or euros) to both the country and project developers from CDM also meant that the Ministry of Finance was engaged early with CDM, particularly in the establishment of the CDM Fund from revenue sharing. The CDM Fund currently holds more than US$ 1 billion in funds and provides grants and loans to initiatives to improve energy efficiency and environmental protection in general.


In many other developing countries, the role of CDM DNA has been allocated to the environment ministry. While the area of climate change traditionally fits within that portfolio, these ministries are not usually powerbrokers within government.

The fact that NDRC was appointed CDM DNA meant that CDM was taken seriously from the outset. This political commitment in turn meant provincial and local development and reform commissions (DRCs) also took it seriously. To build awareness of CDM in the regions, China also established 28 provincial CDM service centers to identify opportunities and provide assistance to project developers and government officials.

Hands on Process

The CDM Measures contain detailed requirements for CDM project activities to be hosted by China. They stipulate that each potential CDM project shall adhere to the regular Chinese project approval process, in accordance with China’s related laws, rules and regulations. In addition, potential CDM project activities are subject to a domestic CDM project approval cycle to obtain official Chinese DNA approval.

The rules further require that, during implementation and monitoring of the CDM project activity: i) NDRC supervises the implementation of the CDM project activity to improve implementation quality; ii) the CDM project developer shall submit project implementation and monitoring reports; and iii) the NDRC records the Certified Emission Reductions (CERs) issued by the CDM. In the normal project approval process, provincial DRCs need to be kept informed of project progress and there are regular checks for projects.

Given the link between the NDRC and its provincial arms, it is also possible to ensure frequent updates and checks of CDM projects. For example, for CDM project approval the national office of the NDRC invites an official from the local office of the Planning Commission for comments about the project’s contribution to sustainable development under local conditions and to verify the statements made in the Project Design Document (PDD) and application documents. This ‘hands-on’, cross-departmental approach enables the government to monitor projects more closely and ensure that the desired local benefits are achieved.


Although the Chinese Government actively supports the CDM, China is unique amongst host countries in imposing a number of approaches that are effectively restrictions on CDM projects. Four of these restrictions are listed below.

A floor price for CERs

From the outset the DNA imposed an unwritten floor price on the sale of CERs. The DNA requires the Emission Reduction Purchase Agreement to be submitted as part of the application for CDM approval. The floor price was enforced by refusing approval for projects where the purchase price was deemed to be too low. The floor price had been kept stable at 8 euros – or even higher for some project types, such as wind power – since 2008. In early 2012, however, the floor price was lowered to 7 euros, as a response to CERs hitting record low prices.

The floor price was officially introduced by the government in 2005, to ensure a fair price for Chinese project owners: ‘CER prices should amply reflect the incremental costs of the CDM project, including investment and operation/maintenance costs, PDD development, validation, registration, administration and adaptation levies, among others. The floor price also prevented ‘cheap’ Chinese CERs flooding the market and lowering prices globally, an outcome the Chinese Government was keen to prevent.

A levy of between 2% and 65% on CER revenue

The levy imposed on CER revenues allows the government to share in the benefits of implementing CDM projects. It also provides resources for funding of sustainable development initiatives. Projects with higher sustainable development benefits, such as renewable energy and energy efficiency projects, are subject to the lowest levy of 2%.

Other project types, which tend to generate much larger volumes of CERs at relatively low production costs, have much higher levies applied. For example 30% on adipic acid nitrous oxide (N2O) destruction projects and a 65% levy applied to hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) destruction projects.

Over 90% of all projects are in priority sectors encouraged by the Chinese Government (i.e. renewable energy and energy efficiency projects which have high local sustainable development benefits). Levies collected are transferred to the State-controlled CDM Fund.

Project entities must be under Chinese control

To be eligible to implement a CDM project, a project developer must be Chinese-controlled. In practice this means that project entities must be either a Chinese domestic entity or a joint venture in which the foreign shareholding is no more than 49%.

Limit to the volume of CERs to be sold from an individual project

Chinese letters of approval specify the maximum volume of CERs, based on PDD estimates, which can be transferred from a project to a buyer. Although most projects tend to underperform in terms of PDD expectations, if a project does exceed this cap then the Chinese project developer requires additional approval, potentially subject to new restrictions, before selling CERs. This is an extension of the CER floor measure where the Chinese Government wanted to ensure Chinese CERs were not being sold to buyers too cheaply.

These approaches were used in Chinese projects with the objective of protecting Chinese interests and promoting equitable sharing in the benefits obtained from selling CERs – and they seem to be working.

Mainstreaming climate change and energy goals

The Chinese Government issues 5-year plans to coordinate national policy goals, and in recent years climate change and energy policy issues have begun to be incorporated into these plans. An energy intensity target (reduction by 20% over 5 years) was set in the Eleventh Five-Year Plan (2006–2010). Greater attention has been paid to climate change in the Twelfth Five-Year Plan (2011–2015). Targets that are congruent with commitments that China made at the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) Copenhagen and Cancun conferences in 2009 and 2010, respectively, can be found in the Twelfth Five-Year Plan: the 5-year carbon intensity reduction goal is 17%; and the 2015 non-fossil fuel goal is set to reach 11.4% of China’s total energy mix.

These national targets are then further broken down into provincial and local targets. The performance of local officials and heads of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) is reviewed against these targets and the evaluation has significant bearing on promotion and future job prospects. Failure to perform can lead to dismissal or demotion in certain cases.

Traditionally, performance criteria consisted mainly of economic growth targets. The recent inclusion of environmental and energy targets in the target responsibility system has been instrumental in motivating local government officials to act on climate change.

For many provincial governments, CDM has been attractive primarily as it provides new sources of revenue to local projects (many of which are owned by SOEs), but also because it provides incentives for investment in renewable energy projects, and therefore helps towards meeting climate-related targets set by central government. There are therefore direct personal incentives for officials within provincial DRCs to ensure projects are implemented quickly and efficiently, and deliver desired local benefits.

An external factor influencing policy evolution is the fact that Phase III of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme will not accept CERs from projects not registered by the end of 2012, unless they are located in a Least Developed Country. In response, the Chinese government is actively developing its domestic emissions trading scheme. The scheme will be launched in pilot cities like Beijing and Shanghai in early 2013. In these cities trading infrastructure is being developed, and major emitters covered by the scheme have already been allocated their emission allowances.

The scheme will be a combination of allowance trading and project-based offsets. A national standard for project-based offsets is being developed, but in the meantime CDM methodologies are the only recognized standard. Therefore many new projects are still moving ahead, even though they will not be able to sell CERs to the EU, but to a domestic market instead. The Chinese government’s goal is to have a nationwide trading scheme starting in 2015.

Although the CDM’s future is uncertain, according to a UN Panel Review, embracing the mechanism gave China valuable experience in the carbon market and prepared it for a domestic emissions trading system.

Additional resources

Please see our Reprint Guidelines for details on republishing our articles.