<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Ecosystem Marketplace</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.ecosystemmarketplace.com</provider_url><title>Carbon monitoring costs and their effect on incentives to sequester carbon through forestry - Ecosystem Marketplace</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="KagBlDfav4"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.ecosystemmarketplace.com/resources/carbon-monitoring-costs-and-their-effect-on-incentives-to-sequester-carbon-through-forestry/"&gt;Carbon monitoring costs and their effect on incentives to sequester carbon through forestry&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://www.ecosystemmarketplace.com/resources/carbon-monitoring-costs-and-their-effect-on-incentives-to-sequester-carbon-through-forestry/embed/#?secret=KagBlDfav4" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;Carbon monitoring costs and their effect on incentives to sequester carbon through forestry&#x201D; &#x2014; Ecosystem Marketplace" data-secret="KagBlDfav4" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(c,l){"use strict";var e=!1,o=!1;if(l.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage);else if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(!t);else if(!(t.secret||t.message||t.value));else if(/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret));else{for(var r,s,a,i=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),n=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=0;o&lt;n.length;o++)n[o].style.display="none";for(o=0;o&lt;i.length;o++)if(r=i[o],e.source!==r.contentWindow);else{if(r.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message){if(1e3&lt;(s=parseInt(t.value,10)))s=1e3;else if(~~s&lt;200)s=200;r.height=s}if("link"===t.message)if(s=l.createElement("a"),a=l.createElement("a"),s.href=r.getAttribute("src"),a.href=t.value,a.host===s.host)if(l.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener("message",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",t,!1),c.addEventListener("load",t,!1);function t(){if(o);else{o=!0;for(var e,t,r,s=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf("MSIE 10"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(/Trident.*rv:11\./),i=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),n=0;n&lt;i.length;n++){if(!(r=(t=i[n]).getAttribute("data-secret")))r=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),t.src+="#?secret="+r,t.setAttribute("data-secret",r);if(s||a)(e=t.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute("security"),t.parentNode.replaceChild(e,t);t.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:r},"*")}}}}(window,document);
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><description>Concerns have been expressed that participation of land-use change and forestry projects (LUCF) projects in mitigation markets may be constrained by high costs. Of particular concern are the transaction costs incurred in measuring, certifying and selling the carbon-sequestration services generated by LUCF projects. This paper addresses these issues by reviewing the implications of transaction and [&hellip;]</description><thumbnail_url>https://www.ecosystemmarketplace.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/EM-LOGO-new-draft_2_small.png</thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width>987</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height>445</thumbnail_height></oembed>
